No drawing, no supplier, no stock, and a crane that had to work. The part had to be measured from the worn original and made to a new drawing.
| Application | Deck crane slewing ring |
|---|---|
| Situation | Obsolete for 9 years, no drawing, no stock |
| Approach | Measure, draw, approve, manufacture |
| Material | 52100, induction-hardened raceways |
| Lead time | 9 weeks including drawing approval |
| Alternative | Crane rebuild — several times the cost, longer downtime |
The crane was nineteen years old and the slewing ring had been obsolete for nine. The original maker had been absorbed twice. There was no drawing, no catalogue entry, and no equivalent in any standard range — slewing rings are made to the application, not to a size table.
The commercial alternative was a crane rebuild, quoted at several times the cost of a ring with a much longer downtime. The technical alternative was to reverse-engineer the part from the worn original — which is possible, but only if the wear is understood rather than copied.
A worn raceway is not the original raceway. If it is measured at the worn surface, the replacement is made to the worn geometry — with the clearance already opened and the section already reduced. The measurements have to be taken on unworn references: the mounting faces, the gear teeth away from the pitch line, the seal grooves. That distinction is the difference between a part that fits and a part that lasts.
| Parameter | Source | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Boundary dimensions | Measured, unworn references | Bolt circle and height define the interface |
| Raceway geometry | Measured + standard section | Wear allowance removed |
| Gear data | Tooth count, module, pressure angle | Measured away from the worn pitch line |
| Material / hardness | Specified — 52100, induction hardened | Original unknown, so specified |
| Clearance | Specified from the duty | Not copied from the worn part |
| Sealing and lubrication | Specified | Original ports reused where sound |
Most can, if the part is available to measure and the material can be inferred or specified. The limits are special processes — a proprietary seal design, an unusual coating — where the geometry can be copied but the process cannot.
Nine weeks in this case, including drawing approval. The drawing and approval stage is usually two weeks; the rest is material, heat treatment and grinding.
Usually, and the downtime is shorter. But the comparison must include the risk: a new part carries a first-off risk that a proven rebuild does not.
Send the model, the service hours and photographs of the damage. We will name the failure mode and what to change — not just quote the same part again.